<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: consistency counts</title>
	<link>http://seopartner.com/consistency-counts.htm</link>
	<description>Your one stop blog for seo tips, seo software and web optimization in general</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on consistency counts by: Work@HomeGuru</title>
		<link>http://seopartner.com/consistency-counts.htm#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seopartner.com/consistency-counts.htm#comment-15</guid>
					<description>Thank you, Thank you, Thank you! A problem with my site has been bugging me for weeks and I just saw this posting. I was trying to figure out how auto-generating some keyword-rich content pages and adding them to my site could have hurt it's ranking. I'm using a product that generates the pages into a template but they look good enough and the HTML looked relatively clean to me. Sure enough, I just checked it and the content type info is different. At least now I know what to fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thank you, Thank you, Thank you! A problem with my site has been bugging me for weeks and I just saw this posting. I was trying to figure out how auto-generating some keyword-rich content pages and adding them to my site could have hurt it&#8217;s ranking. I&#8217;m using a product that generates the pages into a template but they look good enough and the HTML looked relatively clean to me. Sure enough, I just checked it and the content type info is different. At least now I know what to fix.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
