<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: guaranteed top ranking?</title>
	<link>http://seopartner.com/guaranteed-top-ranking.htm</link>
	<description>Your one stop blog for seo tips, seo software and web optimization in general</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on guaranteed top ranking? by: SEOguy</title>
		<link>http://seopartner.com/guaranteed-top-ranking.htm#comment-9</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 02:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seopartner.com/guaranteed-top-ranking.htm#comment-9</guid>
					<description>Yeah, no joke! I've had so many customers insist on getting a &quot;guarantee&quot; because so many other SEO's offer one. But when I read the competitor's &quot;guarantee conditions&quot;  and explain what they mean, that same customer feels a little foolish. I assure them that it is not their fault, but they feel like they were almost taken advantage of. And I can see why. SEO's who pull stunts like choosing easy but worthless keywords, just to fulfill a guarantee, give all of us a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah, no joke! I&#8217;ve had so many customers insist on getting a "guarantee" because so many other SEO&#8217;s offer one. But when I read the competitor&#8217;s "guarantee conditions"  and explain what they mean, that same customer feels a little foolish. I assure them that it is not their fault, but they feel like they were almost taken advantage of. And I can see why. SEO&#8217;s who pull stunts like choosing easy but worthless keywords, just to fulfill a guarantee, give all of us a bad name.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
